Bézier Curves-Based Novel Out-of-Path Beamforming Calibration Technique in IEEE 802.11 WLAN Networks
M. Guessous et al.
40 views since: 2019-01-31

Phase Locked Loop based on adaptive observer
R. Montejano et al.
35 views since: 2014-02-28

The Systems of Dashboards and Performance Indicators in University
S. Wakrim et al.
32 views since: 2017-07-31

Good Solution for Resource Distribution: Multi-Agent & Cloud Computing in Distributed Data Mining
A. Fariz et al.
25 views since: 2017-10-31

Augmented Reality as a Design Tool for Maintenance Applications
N. Zenati et al.
22 views since: 2017-10-31

Focus and Scope

The International Journal on Computer and Communications Networks, Computational Intelligence and Data Analytics is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers on all branches of the academic Computer Science.

Thematic areas include, but are not limited to:

• Computer systems security, hardware and embedded systems security, security protocol design and analysis, cryptography and cryptanalysis, intrusion detection systems and techniques, user authentication techniques and systems;
• Software engineering, algorithms and complexity, computational logic, formal methods, heuristics, mathematics and models of computation, programming languages and semantics.
• Networking devices, Network and distributed architectures and protocols, traffic engineering, resource management and Quality of Service, network monitoring and traffic measurements, wireless networks, personal and body area networks, vehicular networks, content and service-centric networking, online social network computing, autonomic computing;
• multimedia communications and standards and signal processing, energy efficient/green networks, opportunistic and cognitive networks;
• Human computer interaction, computational science, pattern recognition, computer vision, speech processing, machine intelligence and reasoning, web science, databases, information retrieval, visualisation, current applications domains.

The Editorial policy is to maintain a reasonable balance between papers regarding different research areas so that the Journal will be useful to all interested scientific groups.

The International Journal on Computer and Communications Networks, Computational Intelligence and Data Analytics also publishes letters to the Editor and research notes which discuss new research, or research in progress in any of the above thematic areas.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

After submitting a paper, it will be peer-reviewed.
All our journals are peer-reviewed. Reviewers are appointed by the journal Editor.

Peer review has two key functions: 
- To act as a filter and determine the validity, significance and originality of the work to ensure only good research is published. 
- To improve the quality of research submitted for publication by giving reviewers the opportunity to suggest improvements.

The review procedure

Each submitted paper is subjected to the following review procedure:
- Preliminarly, the Plagiarism Prevention Office (plagiarismprev@praiseworthyprize.org) checks each submission through the Ithenticate’s CrossCheck software, in order to detect instances of overlapping and similar text in submitted manuscripts (click here to find out more about CrossCheck for Researchers), comunicating the results of the test to the Editor-in-Chief of the journal only in the case of abnormal percentage of similarity;
- the Editor-in-Chief, if not in conflict of interest, decides for general publication suitability;
- in case of conflict of interest, the Editorial Office invites an "Helper Editor" among the members of the Editorial Board to manage the process for the paper;
- the Editor-in-Chief (or the Helper Editor) assigns submission to a Section Editor (or to himself) among the members of the Editorial Board to see through the editorial process; 
- the Section Editor invites 3 high profile experts as Reviewers to perform an independent review of the article and to collect at least two review reports per manuscript;
- the Journal adopts a single-blind peer review: the Reviewers are aware of the identity of the Authors, but the Authors are unaware of the identity of the Reviewers;
- taking care of the recommendations of the Reviewers, the Section Editor decides whether the particular article may be accepted as it is, or it may be revised or rejected;
- the Section Editor contacts the Corresponding Author by email with the editorial decision, Editor comments and Reviewer comments. Authors will be requested to revise their manuscript according to the Reviewers' suggestions, comments and criticisms;
- the revised manuscript must be returned within one month and the review process begins again.

Peer review process flowchart

• Editor's Role
  

  The Editor oversees the editorial process, beginning with the assignment of the Section Editor to a submission. The Editor often plays the role of Section Editor in seeing accepted submissions through the Editing stage of the editorial process.

Ethical Guidelines

Publication Frequency

The Journal is published quarterly, appearing on the last day of January, April, July, October.

Journal's Consent Policy

Generic users, readers and authors who register themselves for a private access to the journal website, give implicitly their consent for Praise Worthy Prize to process their personal data in compliance with the Privacy Policy they had sight of.

Reviewers Suggestion

In the submission process, the submitter is requested for kindly suggest three potential reviewers with the appropriate acknowledged expertise to review the manuscript. These reviewers will not be automatically approved by the Managing Editor.
At Step 1 of the submission procedure please provide detailed contact information (address, homepage, phone, verified institutional e-mail address). The proposed reviewers should neither be current collaborators of the co-authors nor have published with any of the co-authors of the manuscript within the last five years, according to the Ethical requirement of the review process. They should be from different institutions of the authors. The submitter may also identify appropriate members of the Editorial Board of this journal or others Praise Worthy Prize's journals as potential reviewers. The submitter may also suggest reviewers from the authors that you frequently cite in your paper.